Art is dead, long live Art

~§~
All things must come to an end. This is my last post. Thanks for reading and for sharing your thoughts.
Oh, and before any one reads too much into this post… I’m fine.
Just saying.
~§~
Recently, a self-proclaimed photo artist, was lamenting that art is dead and blaming art’s demise on the profusion of technology which has apparently diluted photographic art into a quagmire of hipster-filtered, low resolution snaps.
Whatever.
To mourn’s art’s passing, if it has indeed passed away, seems to me to be somewhat enigmatic or at least puzzling. Hasn’t art died a thousand deaths? With every new age, with every new, world-changing discovery hasn’t art died only to be reborn in some new form perhaps with a new message but always with the same intent… to exist for its own sake?
If Art is dead then I can only say, long live Art.
I can, albeit reluctantly, imagine a future where still photography will go the way of cave paintings and etchings. But the death of still photography as an art form would not mean the death of art. For me art has a life of its own. It creates itself and re-invents itself using some providential humans (who we end up calling artists) as its channel. All I am saying is, art forms die but art is eternal.
And life is a lot like art.
From the moment we are born we are given but one guarantee and that is that we will… one day… die. Of all the potential and possibilities that life holds for us at birth, death is one that will not be denied. I do not wish to make light of death, its arrival is always sad and all too often tragic but death or at least the promise of death holds a gift that few people appreciate before it is too late.
Art, especially photography where I am concerned, offers the same gift but death adds a sense of urgency to it. In science as in philosophy there is much talk of things that never go beyond the conceptual or theoretical but as our world view changes with new findings, as our perceptions change to see things under a different light – so much so sometimes, that we wonder how we ever saw it any other way – no “fact” is as certain as death. Well… for now at least. And death is personal, death is ours to own. When it is our time to die no one can die for us.
And so, if I am the one to die then I am the one to live.
And therein lies death’s gift. Death makes everything in life matter. Everything. Every aspect, every breath, every emotion, every feeling, every thought. I may give myself other reasons why certain things matter to me but it is the promise of death that makes all of it matter. At this point, if you happen to go along with my premise it can be tempting to go down the well worn path trodden by so many self-help gurus where you re-assess your life and get all new-age and reborn, quit your job, move to another country, go on a diet, start exercising, write a bucket list or whatever but I do not see that as necessary to make the most of the gift that’s being offered. When a gift is offered I like to give something back, in this case, I like to give life my full attention. Whatever it throws at me. What I try to do is be aware of every little thing regardless of what it is. Photography has helped in this respect. Over the years photography has made me more attentive, more cognizant and not just of the things around me but also of all the thoughts and feelings going on internally.
But here is the peculiar thing, as awareness grows something ever so subtle happens. I can only describe it as a kind of detachment, not in terms of feeling separate from it all but rather like a realization that I do not need to take any of it personally. I do not make the photograph, I am not in the photograph, I am, the photograph. Nonsense to be sure but I do not know how to express it any other way. The ego may well feel somewhat cheated by this but there is a certain sense of freedom associated with this awareness. It’s just… not… personal. Perhaps not even death it would seem.
Life, just like art, never dies of course. It is only the stories that end; the stories of us, the stories of species, the stories of cultures, the stories of civilizations, the stories of forests and cities, of worlds and stars and gods. Life, however, creates itself, invents itself with new stories unfolding eternally and always with the same intent… to exist for its own sake.
Just. Like. Art.

Sad but uplifting! This is deep: “I do not make the photograph, I am not in the photograph, I am, the photograph.”
As they say, a camera points in two directions.
And if there wouldn’t be death – or the end of things – there wouldn’t be life. Keep well!
Thanks Juha, I’ve always appreciated your thoughts here. I’ll keep in touch over on your blog ;)
Is this realy your last blog? Is it the death of the only blog I read on a regular basis? So often you seem to speak from within me. Thank you for your many words in the past and I hope to find more in the future.
Cheers Alan
Thanks Alan. As much as I’ve always thought of this blog as pretty much useless I am glad to know that you found value in it. I think there are 4 or 5 other people who might feel the same way ;) My wife for one called me an idiot for stopping but she’s always full of such compliments LOL.
But I do enjoy writing so I may do something else someday. Maybe on Google+ as that seems like a place with plenty of photographers and artists to look at. In any case I’ll keep in touch on Red Bubble.
Glad your fine, good luck with the next stage….
cheers,
John
Cheers John. No planned next stage for now but I guess there’s always going to be something to follow what has just passed by.
You follow through your thoughts so exhaustive I usually have no oxygen left in my lungs while reading your last sentences. I never die, quite the opposite, I have always enjoyed the sensation.
I do see there’s an end of everything, even Plop, so thank you for sharing these last words on your favourite matter. Art is dead, long live art.
Thanks Ove, very kind of you. May I say that lately some of your images have made me feel much the same way, specially your latest SoFoBoMo effort. It is wonderful.
Thanks, Cedric! We’ll keep in touch in the blogosphere and I might even give social media another chance, just to not lose contact with you. Cheers, my friend.
Might we hope that there’s a little of Brett Favre in you? That you’ll “retire” and then “unretire” 5 or 6 times? Not that I’m a big fan of Favre, but some people should definitely keep their hand in the game. Like you, for instance.
In any case, keep your camera close and stay well. Hopefully, our paths will cross again.
Hi Paul, I haven’t heard of Favre but we do have a couple of singers over here who have had a number of “farewell” concerts and yes, who knows, I may well do the same. It’s kind of strange but for some time now I have felt that I have exhausted the kind of subject matter I’ve touched upon here on Plop. I tend to write from a personal viewpoint and quite unexpectedly I’ve reached a point where I’m finding it much too difficult to put things into words without sounding like… well, a bit of a douchebag I guess. Even this last post took a long time to write itself. I started writing it back in April when my father first got sick and only finished it after he passed away at the end of July. While my father and I were not overly close it is possible that his passing has had an influence on my decision to stop writing on Plop. If that is the case then it is quite possible that I may return but it is likely to be awhile I would think.
One thing for sure though, I will continue to follow the blogs of all the people who have been regulars here on Plop (quite easy to do since that only amounts to about half a dozen) so I’ll never be too far.
I did not always post, but I always read. Safe journeys.
Hi Chris, thanks for dropping by. Like I said to Paul above I’ll be around.
Happy birthday for the other day by the way. I missed mentioning it on the actual day but I did think of you. Hope you had a good one.
I’ve only been involved with blogs for less than a year, but i have always found this to be a regular stop in my surfing. You have expressed some feelings, both witty and profound, that I could not express myself, and with some of the best photos on any blog. Thank you.
OK, Cedric: I’ll try to not be too attached to the passing of your blog! :) It had to happen one day, I suppose. I’ll keep an eye out for you in G+, for sure. Perhaps that will be the new wave of the future. I, for one, can be counted as one who regularly reads your blog on those few times when you care to grace us with a post.
Regarding the implied topic of immortality, my girlfriend and I were discussing this very thing. We like to come up with thought-provoking questions. I happened to ask her if she thought that she’d want to be immortal. At first, she thought so, saying that it would give her time to do everything that she’d always wanted to do. After I tendered my answer, saying in effect, I wouldn’t want to be immortal because, then nothing would matter and I’d probably never get around to those things that I wanted to because I could have endless procrastination. Nothing would matter.
I’ve certainly enjoyed the blog. Hopefully, you’ll keep in touch via e-mail, G+, or other methods. I still intend to meet you one day.
Peace!
[...] Though a few days behind, I was rather surprised, as I was getting caught up with my fellow bloggers, to find that Cedric, author of Plop, said that he was exiting the blogging game. [...]
Pingback by Farewell, Cedric » Paul Lester Photo | August 24, 2011 |
High speed internet and the advancement of technology starting at about 1990 destroyed how art is now perceived. The saturation of media coupled with the limitless ways to acquire media for free has completely devalued art. Music, visual, movies and anything that can be downloaded or manipulated digitally is and will be downloaded for free. There are so many people living under the delusion that they are artists now that the industry is nothing more than a sad pathetic joke. There is really no way to make a living creating art anymore so future generations will most likely be culturally dead or is that already happened?
Hi Jim, thanks for dropping by. You make some interesting points but I feel the need to address a couple of them. Having free access to art does not in any way devalue art. Equating monetary value to art is to me, a huge mistake and doing so only cheapens the viewer not the artwork. Don’t get me wrong, I am not validating the wanton “sharing” that goes on in our digital world. All I am saying is that art, real art, holds it’s value by simply existing. This human “need” to own things (a fascinating topic in itself) is what has placed a price on art and that, I suspect, is more to blame than technology and media saturation.
True artists will create art because they have no choice in the matter. They are driven to it. They will do it even if it means living in poverty (I know a couple like that). But I would suggest that most of the self-proclaimed artists of today are driven by something less noble. The concept of “making a living” from art is relatively new in human history and I have nothing against it but when someone becomes an artist in order to make a living then she is no artist. At least in my eyes. As I said in my article, art is created for its own sake. Everything else that comes from it is a bonus.